skippy dot net

In-Series 2.0

In-Series 2.0 is now available!

This version allows for negative numbers when ordering your series, so you can now easily insert items at the beginning of your series without re-numbering all the existing entries. Note that due to an unfortunate bug in WordPress 1.5.2, you will be unable to use a zero.

In-Series 2.0 also fixes a few minor problems with the all_series() template tag.

Thanks to Drew for his assistance debugging this!

skippy

In-Series 2.0 was authored by skippy on . This entry has been taggged with the keywords: , , and . If you would like to follow the comments on this post, you can subscribe to its Atom feed.

12 Comments

gravatar

On Fr. Daniel added:

Skippy, the Readme file for this plugin is still missing the final "s" (on "contents") in the line.

gravatar

On skippy added:

Fr. Daniel: thanks! I've corrected that, and updated the zip file.

gravatar

On Drew Vogel added:

Skippy... I installed the 'release' version (instead of the betas we'd been working with) of this plugin but noticed that it broke the "" functionality... If you visit http://www.drewvogel.com/index.php/all-series/ you'll see what I mean. I've got more than the single series that's listed there...

That page is generated by a page template... Please let me know how this can be addressed, and thanks for a great plugin!

gravatar

On Marcos added:

I simply wanted you to know, it's working great! Thank you a lot.

gravatar

On Djarnis added:

Have you thought about adding a sorting parameter to some of the functions like "series_table_of_contents()".
To me it would be more intuitive if the newest post was on top, instead of at the bottom.

gravatar

On Andrew Peacock added:

Love it, love it, love it. I hate creating new categories that only hold maybe half-a-dozen related posts, and this plugin has made each series of posts so much easier to link together without having a million categories.

Thank you VERY much,

Andy

gravatar

On Alan added:

Nice plugin. I added a line (around line 30) after "$this_series = array();"

if (!$ids) {$ids=array_reverse($arrPost_IDs);}

Which allows you to get away with not putting in the series_order data, and just lists in raw db order (i.e. should be ID). Currently it throws an error if you don't do it, and i thought it would be nice for the lazier of us!

gravatar

On Alan added:

My mistake - my change doesn't do what i said at all! it puts them in reverse order of how you add the metadata :-(

I'll knock together the ID order hack tho.

gravatar

On Alan added:

get rid of the "array_reverse" in my added line (above) and put in an "order by post_id" on the end of the query in the line starting $arrPost_IDs = $wpdb->get_col(... line

gravatar

On Eduo added:

Hey.

I've used in-series for a while and today I was thinking on making a multi-chaptered post with a tutorial, which some friends have asked for.

I have the option of using a paginated article or using in-series and I can't decide. After a while I realised that the only thing I wasn't sure on in-series was the fact that I can't, to my knowledge, display the full contents of the whole series as a single article if I so desired. I do like the episodic nature of in-series but the inability to have the users being able to print or generate a single page with everything on it is kind of limiting.

Have you considered giving the option of displaying the full serialized article? I had thought either modifying the page.php file or creating a new book.php file that is linked from in-series TOCs ("Click here for all chapters in a single page" or something).

If there is already something like this I may have missed or if you have plans for something like this let me know.

Something nice as well would be a box like the current categories one with a listing of existing series and a field to add new series. It would make it much easier creating a new-in-series post when the previous one was entered a year ago.

Regards

Eduo

gravatar

On Daniel added:

Nice plugin very handy.However Ive got a bug with the all_series() function. Its seems to only display the first series name instead of listing all the different series. Any ideas about this?

And You Are?
Something to add?